YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR

Perhaps in an effort to show the limits of thinking in 140 or fewer characters, the Senate Republicans and the Senate Republicans plus Rodney Tom and the other guy tweeted the same thing at the same time yesterday:

Maj Coalition Caucus ‏@WashingtonMCC
Question: Is it time for a small tuition CUT? #UW #WSU #WWU #CWU #EWU #WSUV #UWT #highered #STEM #waleg #tuition
 
Senate Republicans@WashingtonSRC
Question: Is it time for a small tuition CUT? #UW #WSU #WWU #CWU #EWU #WSUV #UWT #highered #STEM #waleg #tuition
 
Answer: Well, no, it’s long past time for a BIG tuition cut.  Which is just another way of saying that it is long past time for a big reinvestment of state funds in higher education.  To cut tuition without adding state support would be like turning the heat off while it’s still twenty below.
 
The Senate Republicans, led by the dashing and ambitious young Senator Michael Baumgartner, have been trying to make political hay out of tuition since way back at the beginning of the regular legislative session.  This makes sense, as tuition has increased about 60 percent in the last four years, and students and their families have gone from paying 30 percent of the total cost of their educations to paying 70 percent in the last ten years.  This steep increase in the price of college has fired up pundits and bloggers and ambitious legislators across the country.
 
Unfortunately the 140 character pace of our discourse often leaves out the stark reality that tuition increases are the product of one thing only: cuts in state support.  Here, in 363 characters, are the facts about higher education in Washington state that have led to tuition increases:
 
–Washington’s state universities have had more than 50% of their state support cut in the last four years.
 
–Washington ranks 49th in the country, two dollars per student ahead of Florida, in total per student support for higher education.
 
–Adjusted for inflation, the cost of instruction at our state universities has remained flat for the last twenty years.
 
#Running on Fumes
 
With a pretty blithe disregard for these facts, Senator Baumgartner introduced a bill way back in the regular session that would cut tuition by 3%.  Aiming squarely at the cheap seats, he and two other Republicans held a press conference and announced that their plan added a bunch of money to higher, which would allow them to cut tuition. 

Would that it were so.

In less than a day, the budget officers at our state universities had read the fine print and crunched the numbers and discovered that much of what Baumgartner was calling “new” money was really just maintenance funding built on a wildly eroded base.  The end result would be a further 3.5 percent cut to our already criminally low per student funding. 

But the idea of a tuition decrease is politically exciting enough to leave the senate still tweeting about it at this late date.  None of the budgets currently on the table do anything real to increase investment in higher ed.  That’s why the much more sober and realistic House Democrat budget calls for a modest 3% tuition increase. 

At the end of the day, that increase will end up costing students and their families less.  When budgets get cut, classes become more scarce and it takes longer to get a degree.  So the extra $255 a small tuition increase would cost becomes an extra $8500 to stay another year in school. 

So when the state senate ruling caucuses tweet in stereo about cutting tuition, it’s grounded in one of two things: either an ideological commitment to destroying public higher education that’s needs more than 140 characters to explain or a cheap political ploy that’s not worth the bits its made of.

Share via email

IN DREAMS BEGIN RESPONSIBILITIES

And all this time we thought Republicans just hated collective bargaining.  Turns out they don’t really understand how it works.  

act11Anyone who has ever successfully negotiated a contract knows that the goal is not to win but to reach an agreement.  Both sides start with dreams, find the responsibilities embedded in those dreams, and end with the reality of a deal that nobody likes, but everybody can live with.  At some point during the negotiations, each side has to make a big move toward the other side, giving up things that they hold dear without compromising basic principles.  

In the negotiations over the 2013-15 Washington State Operating Budget, the House Democrats made that big move on June 6.  They broke the hearts of a big part of their base, gave up their dream of a moderately more responsible tax structure, and passed a revised budget that was a shadow of their original proposal.  

act2That was the signal to the Republican Senate that it was their turn to make a big move.  So over the weekend they got together and passed…well, pretty much the same budget they’d passed a couple of months before.  Only this time they did it with five fewer votes, with grownups like Jim Hargrove and Sharon Nelson, who had voted with them in April in a responsible attempt to move the process along toward compromise, having now abandoned them (and now that only Tom and Sheldon are still voting with them, it’s probably time to let go of that whole Majority Coalition thing).  To put it in the refined technical terms of bargaining, the Senate Republicans gave the House Democrats the finger.

In their defense, we should probably point out that this is all pretty new to most of these guys.  The senators now in charge haven’t really had much experience being in charge.  Until now, their dreams have had no responsibilities attached.  They haven’t been the ones who’ve had to actually make the deal, they’ve mostly had the enviable luxury of righteously casting irrelevant no votes from the minority or the back bench.  

The actual dollar difference between the two budgets is no longer the issue.  The Senate has made it clear that before they will move any closer to the House on the budget, they must have action on a series of policy bills.  This insistence continues long after the House Democrats and Governor Inslee have abandoned their policy dreams of the Dream Act and Reproductive Parity.  

In response to this Republican insistence on pushing policy long after the policy bell has rung, the House Democrats and the Governor have accused the Senate Republicans of holding the state budget hostage to ideology.  

If only that were true.  If only the current circus were being driven by actual ideologues with actual principles.  That would be incredibly refreshing.

But alas, the current Republican lineup of policy bills is buttressed by nothing more than electoral politics.   

SB 5127, which would allow structured settlements for workers’ compensation, doesn’t do squat for the budget, since workers’ comp is funded by employer and employee contributions.  But if the House Democrats were forced to pass this as part of a budget deal, it would drive a wedge between the Democrats and Labor, which might lead to less labor money and organizing for Democrats in the next election.

SB 5242, with the Orwellian title of “Mutual Consent,” is the stupidest of the so-called “education reform” bills.  It would allow principals to fire teachers for no reason at all.  Not even the principlals want this, but if the House Democrats caved on this one, it would certainly sour the Washington Education Association on the Democrats.

SB 5895 is a dusting off of Rob McKenna’s (losing) campaign platform.  It would severely limit spending on everything except education (all the cool kids are calling it “education by starvation”) and if it passed it would be a rock around Jay Inslee’s neck right through the 2016 gubernatorial election.

Nobody should be shocked that most of what goes on in Olympia is about elections, but with a second special session already underway and a government shutdown looming, the Senate Republicans are now taking things to Boehner/McConnell levels.  

Meanwhile, the budget that will eventually pass isn’t going to do much for the thing that everyone has claimed that this legislative session has been about: education.  The only significant tax in the budget will be a tax that specifically targets teachers: the repeal of I-732, which both Democrats and all the rabidly anti-tax Republicans have agreed on from day one.  That will balance the budget on the backs of teachers to the tune of about three hundred million dollars.  Even with that tax, there will only be about $700 million in new investments in K-12 education, about half of what the McCleary decision calls for.

Can’t wait to hear what the Supreme Court has to say about that.

Share via email

FAITHLESS LOVE

Adequate funding for higher education in Washington state is like a ship on the horizon, a dream that never seems to sail any closer. 

Governor Inslee has now joined the long list of public officials pointing at that ship, telling the Seattle City Club that “We’re really at risk of having our colleges erode.”  Pretty much everybody in Olympia, on both sides of the aisle, says the same thing.  (And since he’s new, we’ll cut the governor some slack on not getting it completely right—we’re at risk of having our colleges further erode.) 

erosion5Everybody knows we’re killing our colleges, nobody seems to be willing or able to do anything about it.  The business community moans and groans about STEM graduates but resists closing even the most obsolete tax loophole to pay for them.  The Seattle Times puts half-page ads for its wonderful Greater Good Campaign directly opposite editorials that relentlessly describe state employees (i.e. the people who work in our colleges) as the root of all evil.  And legislators’ responses range from sincere concern to puffy demagoguery, but nobody seems to be able to create the political will to generate the real resources necessary to stop the slipping. 

The special session stumbles along with three budget proposals on the table, none of which stops the erosion that the governor is worried about.  Technically, none of the three budgets makes new cuts to higher education.  But they all enshrine the new normal of the old cuts, leaving college and university base funding well below where it was in 2009, and doing nothing to address the growing problems of restricted access, larger classes, and increased time to graduation. 

The governor and the House Democrats allow for modest tuition increases, which would allow our colleges and universities to continue treading the foul water we’ve been thrown into.  The senate Republicans (er, sorry, Majority Coalition Caucus), apparently assuming that it’s better for a student to pay another $8000 for an extra year of college than an extra $400 to finish on time, have proposed no tuition increases.  This attempt to play to the cheap seats would only leave higher education sinking further on the horizon.

Polling shows that the people of Washington want their children to have access to affordable high quality higher education.  They don’t want their kids working for the people from other states where they invested in higher education.   Our elected officials have responded to that desire with a lot of rhetoric about higher education as the engine of the economy, an area where we must reinvest, etc.  What they haven’t responded with is money.  When all the bullshit is scraped away, we’re left with this stubborn fact: Washington ranks 49th in the country in total per student funding for higher education.

Perhaps someday our ship will come in, but it doesn’t look like it’s going to be this biennium.  Let’s hope that somebody does something before the ship sinks.

Share via email